跳到主要內容

9/21/17 Exit slip

I think that flipped classroom is a great supplement for teachers. Students will be able to watch the videos on their own pace and re-watch them whenever revisions are needed. It also promotes peer learning and gives teacher a lot more insight about how well the students are understanding the materials. This concise and readily available should certainly be an important part of future classrooms.

However like most good things there are downsides of flipped classrooms. The classrooms rely on students to actively participate in the video watching. Many may forget or simply do not want to watch the videos. Some rewarding systems may be needed to address this potential downfall (when teachers give student reward for watching the videos, or some sort of quiz on the videos). Also there are aspects of in class participation and discussions that cannot be replaced by flipped classroom, there are still many important and helpful benefits from traditional classroom teaching such as attending the students and having face to face interactions.

A helpful way may be to incorporate both in our classrooms. There can be flipped classrooms in some classes while we alternate with normal teaching at the same time. It will be more refreshing for the students with different experience and most importantly, the two teaching methods can compliment each other. For example we may have an introduction where students will watch the videos at home and discuss them in class / do practice problems in class under teachers guidance,  while the next class there can be a session where the teacher evaluate the area the students need extra help and and deliver an in-class tutorial on that particular subject. I think that flipped classroom is an exciting technology that has the potential to enrich out teaching if we use it with a good balance.

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Entrance Slip 10/5

The article promotes the benefit of adding gardening to students' education and points out the numerous benefit of such program. I can relate and agree on author's observation of such program taking place. Learning about food and languages are the best way to be humble and learn about others culture in my point of view. Learning the language is a gesture of respect and equalizing the status of our language to the others, while taking the step is very inviting it is certainly not the most efficient way as language takes time to learn. Presenting/sharing  food on the other hand is universal as we all eat as human been, learning/sampling other culture's food is again a very welcoming sign and promotes culture exchange just like how the children shared their eating customs in the article. I really like the idea as food growing and gardening is something that brings the children all over the world together, it is a universal practice that transcend language barriers. It definite...

9/14/17 Exit Slip

 A teacher is also learning just like the student. Every classroom provide a learning opportunity to learn about the students. In the videos we saw how Frank merged with the high school students and embraced their frustrations with the learning materials. He also used his immegrarion stories to empathized with students with difficulties. I think that Frank's approach on teaching is very inspiring. He had to adapt to the foreign circumstances and make the best of what he had. We as teachers will not always be best equip with materials for the class, what is important is to have the will and motivation to better ourselves as much as we can. I agree with Frank when he said you stop being a teacher once you stopped learning. Franks humbling attitude toward teaching is very important for us to look up to. As a teacher he never tried to have a up-to-down attitude while facing students, he mentioned about unmasking as a teacher and instead bringing out his true personalities While tha...

10/19 Entrance Slip

Are the teachers misusing tests and grading to suppress students' learning motivation? The article discusses in many cases students are stressed about grades and feel that its not the best way to learn. Conducting tests for evaluation has long being practiced at schools. It is easy for the teachers to prepare and in theory an effective way to test on students performance. The quantitative nature of a standardized test is beneficial for the teachers to excess students' process. However the side effects of standardized tests were mentioned in the article. The tests themselves do not reflect how well the student's learnt. Many argue it forces students to memorize instead (I beg to differ on this aspect since in many cases its simply how the questions were made, in physics for example its almost not possible to do well on a well designed test without knowing the theories behind the learning units). More so than that many student use it as an indication for comparison. Coming...